Back arrowButton/calendaricon/lockicon/sponsor
Open search
Close search
Login
Call us on0808 168 5874

Not yet a member? Join now

Members’ benefits include:

  • Access to strategic insights, expert analysis, practical advice and inspiration.
  • Exclusive invitations to member-only networking events

chart-1-invt-as-share-of-va 

1. The UK underperformance is not a financial-crisis story

The UK investment gap with EU peers predates the financial crisis. Manufacturing investment fell sharply in the decade leading to the financial crisis and at a stronger pace in the UK than in its major European competitors. Although it has rebounded more strongly since the financial crisis, the gap between the UK and its major European partners still persists.

2. Some of the gap is linked to differences in the asset composition of investment

The differential between the UK and its European partners in terms of manufacturing investment is not all linked to the UK’s underperformance.

Some of the gap, particularly with France and Italy, reflects a lower investment in buildings – something tricky to measure anyway due to differences in real estate valuations and trends.

Another portion reflects differences in services consumption. UK manufacturers are more reliant on transport services, hence a lower investment in transport equipment than their German (0.7pp – or around a quarter of the overall gap) and Italian (0.6pp) competitors.

What about the rest?

3. The gap with France reflects a lower R&D intensity

Although the UK investment rate in intellectual property products (IPP) increased over the past 15 years, the improvement was only marginal and the UK is still lagging behind Germany and France where IPP intensity grew at a more sustained pace in the last decade.

Differences in specialisation between the UK and France do not explain the lower IPP intensity of the UK manufacturing sector. The gap is rather a reflection of the lower R&D intensity of individual subsectors in the UK – on top of these are automotive, electronics and pharma.

chart-2-rd-gap 

4. UK Manufacturers spend less on machines than their Italian and German counterparts

Once differences in the asset composition have been accounted for, UK manufacturers appear to invest considerably less in machines than their German and, to a larger extent, their Italian counterparts.

The specialisation of the UK manufacturing sector is not to blame for the differential with Italy. Because UK manufacturing is more specialised in capital-intensive sectors, the composition effect actually contributes positively to the difference in machinery investment rates between the UK and Italy.

The gap is rather a reflection of the underperformance of individual industries in the UK, a trend that is uneven across subsectors:

  • Other manufacturing (furniture, wood and paper, textiles) and oil and gas account for a third of the differential with Italy. These sectors also contracted as a share of UK manufacturing. The investment gap could thus reflect a reallocation of UK capital towards other sectors of specialisation.

  • On the other hand, the large contribution of labour-intensive industries (e.g. food and drink) could suggest a slower pace of automation. UK manufacturers use 71 robots per 10k employees compared to 301 in Germany and 160 in Italy.

chart-3-other-machines 

5. What’s holding back manufacturers’ investment in automation?

Good news, EEF’s annual Investment Monitor is to be released on Monday next week. It explores in further detail what progress UK industry is making towards investment in automation and new technology and what are the barriers to future investment.

So stay tuned.

 

The full briefing is available to download.